For a discussion on Technology and
Human Values, one of the best movies to watch is iRobot. I selected iRobot, in
particular, because I’d seen it as a child, yet remember absolutely nothing
about the story line. In this film, robotic activity is normal. The human like
robots are created to serve the people and to do all of the “dirty work” that
the people prefer not to do. To see a robot walking around is just as normal as
it is to see any other human in this film. Detective Spooner, who already has a
dislike and distrust of robots, is called to investigate the recent death of Dr
Lanning, an accomplished scientist and designer of the original set of robots.
Detective Spooner took the “robots
don’t do anybody any good” approach from the beginning. Quite honestly, I
identified the most with his stance, not because I think that they aren’t
capable of any good, but because I mainly only hear reasons for creating robots
and not reasons why they can be harmful. In iRobot, the robotics designers and
professionals of U.S.R say that a robot cannot harm a human being – that’s Rule
1. Rule 2 is that robots must obey human orders. Rule 3 , in accordance with
rule 1 and 2, is that robots should defend its own self.
It turns out that the robot, named Sonny,
that Detective Spooner suspected, was
indeed the one responsible for Dr Lanning’s death, upon Dr Lanning’s request,
though, which created a more complex situation. While all of the other NS5
robots turned on the citizens and the older robots, Sonny was actually a good,
more advanced one. V.I.K.I. , the main operational system of USR, was directing
the evil behavior through the other NS5 robots, following the logic that humans
cannot be trusted with their own survival. When V.I.K.I was destroyed, the
robots reverted back to their initial purpose of serving humans. Sonny was the
exception that convinced Detective Spooner to not be totally against all
robots.
Although Detective Spooner came around
to having more trust in robots, he did raise great questions about people’s
fascination with them. “What makes robots much better than being a human being?” People like the initial functions of the
robot, but don’t realize that “one day they’ll have secrets, one day they’ll
have dreams,” and will then be capable of doing way more and way worse than
just serving the humans. Spooner’s
dislike of robots wasn’t their form or because they seemed to weird, because
he, of all others, could relate since his left arm was replaced with a
mechanical one after a tragic accident. Spooner disliked that the robots tended
not to have a heart.
I’ve come to the conclusion that
everything about robots is good, but not all of them are necessarily bad. If
anything, the good and bad qualities of robots reveal quite a few things about
human nature. The Most Human Human explores what artificial intelligence teaches
us about being alive. In it, we learn about the Turing test, which engages
humans in a challenge to determine whether their chat conversation on the
computer is with a human or not. In
iRobot, Detective Spooner’s unspoken question was if the robots could be
trusted, which is similar to questioning how human they are. At first, the fact
that the robots would one day have dreams and secrets, only confirmed his
dislike for them, but experience with Sonny, who seemed to have a positive mind
of its own, proved that the complexity of robots doesn’t always mean bad and
could sometimes mean good, just as it is with humanity and all of its
complexity and capability of doing much good, much evil, or both?
In our reading it was noted that if
a computer ever wins the Turing test challenge, that artificial intelligence
would be what it’s meant to be. I think that Sonny, in iRobot, though obviously
not a human, could get the award for being most human like.
As I continue to develop my
thoughts on the advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence, I will
keep in mind Dr Lanning’s words : “One day they will be capable of dreams, one
day they will have secrets.” And for me, that means that not everything about a robot is good, and not everything is bad - so they could hurt and help as much as humans can, although never adequately replace humans.
I think the goodness of a robot is dependent upon the intentions of the person who created that robot. As they say an invention is only as good as a the person who created it. The defects in the technologies we have today such as cell phones illustrate that technology can be just as imperfect as man. I do believe that the qualities of the robots illustrate things about human nature such as our desire to help and alleviate daily labors. The idea of robots like the ones in I Robot also illustrates man's desire to rule over something but through inventing something already programmed to be a servant or slave opposed to capturing real people and making them seem less than human. Robotic workers alleviate the guilt or moral obligations because of its inhuman elements.
ReplyDeleteI think it is interesting that this movie, unlike others in this genre, ends up with a positive view of robots and not negative. Also, you stated how this character could pass the turing but not be considered or pass as a human to us. That is kind of how I felt about the movie I watched because it was a human's mind downloaded into a computer.
ReplyDeleteRakesha,
ReplyDeleteIROBOT is a good movie to observe our perception of AI's future. What I mean by this is that we assume that Robots will be either good or bad but we neglect that they (supposedly) have the consciousness to choose. What makes you think we have this assumption?