“We are replacing people not with machines, nor with computers, so much
as with method.” In The Most Human Human,
Brian Christian discusses how, strangely enough, when tested, a computer system
known as ELIZA acted as a better therapist to human beings than most
psychologists. When I first read this, it seemed extremely strange to me.
People-real human people- have emotions, feelings, and thoughts, and they have
the capability to understand situations. It seems only logical that, if
something troubling occurs, a person would tell another person. It seems only
natural for someone in need of therapy to go to a therapist. However, according
to Brian Christian, this isn’t necessarily the case. Christian says that when
first testing ELIZA, its creator, Joseph Weizenbaum, was amazed, as the results
were astounding: “people who first talked to ELIZA were convinced they were
having a genuine human interaction.” As Christian tells us, Weizenbaum
proceeded to end the ELIZA project and turned completely against AI technology
after gaining these results.
If I were in
Weizenbaum’s place, my reaction would most likely be extremely similar to his.
I would be massively freaked out that human beings- no different than myself-
preferred going to computers as opposed to living, breathing people for advice.
It seems crazy, especially after watching the 2004 movie, I, Robot. The computer villain, VIKI, wants to make the human race
completely controlled by robots because she does not believe humans are capable
of taking care of themselves.
The movie, I, Robot and The Most Human Human caused me to have two conflicting feelings on
computer therapists, or just about going to computers for help in human related
situations in general. On one hand, there is Brian Christian’s statement on
method. He claims that people feel comfortable speaking to computers about
their problems because they use the same method as a therapist would. They use
the same questions and processes that humans are used to in these situations,
so they do not feel much different than they would if they were speaking to a
human therapist. Still, it was strange to me to think that humans would feel
comfortable sharing their innermost thoughts with a computer, even if they were
using the same “method.” However, then I thought about journaling. Journaling
is something I enjoy doing, and writing my thoughts down is a good stress reliever.
By writing my thoughts in a journal, I am able to release built up emotion
without judgment. After all, that’s why people journal in the first place.
Oddly enough, telling your thoughts and frustrations to a computer is no
different. Computers are databases of information. They can’t judge you the way
humans do. They have no desire to. After thinking about this, it seems logical
that people would rather confess their innermost secrets to a computer as
opposed to a human, especially if they are using the same method anyway.
However, on the other
hand, I still have doubts, as, unlike a notebook, computers are databases of information.
They have the ability to take the information given to them and use it to draw
their own conclusions. While I, Robot
is a fictional movie, the thoughts and actions of VIKI and the robots are not
impossible. VIKI, the computer system, was programmed with the idea that robots
were meant to serve humans and upkeep the human race. However, after observing
human actions, she took that information and came to the conclusion that humans
were not capable of protecting themselves without robots in control. She took the
information she had and drew her own conclusions from it. By venting to
computers, we are providing them more and more information. While it is pretty far
fetched that robots would “take over the world,” it doesn’t seem that overly
far fetched to assume that computers could surpass the human race or take the
place of humans in certain situations. While this could be helpful in some ways,
it could also be dangerous in others. I think it is extremely important for
humans to be mindful of all they use AI technology for and to never
underestimate the importance of human interaction.
I liked your comparison of computers and journals! I think that was a key turning point for me with your post. At first I was like you and pretty baffled about that concept. Honestly, up until this week, I was convinced that was pretty ludicrous. Why would someone want to talk to someone who couldn't relate to them? But like you said, people do journaling and that seems to help them out. I think it might actually be more beneficial for human-computer interactions, actually. If you think about humans, as much as we pretend that we can remain neutral, sometimes that doesn't happen. I have had friends tell me they didn't feel comfortable with their therapist because they felt judged. Then, they never ended up seeking the help they required. It might be more comforting to people that they're talking to a computer that won't judge them internally! However, I am definitely like you again. I think we need to be mindful of robots, but we shouldn't let our fears ruin it all. If they could truly help us, like with medical diagnoses that Brian Christian mentioned, then why not use them?
ReplyDeleteWhen I first read about ELIZA, I thought it was pretty interesting that a computer may be a better therapist than a human. I mean she never made any assumptions or judgements, just asked thought provoking questions. But then I thought more about it, and I thought about the tradeoff. Computers do not have human experience and that in it of itself is what brings humans together in unity. I want to speak to someone about my problems who have had the same problems as me.
ReplyDelete