Friday, November 24, 2017

"Ummm..." Avatar

            Computers are everywhere. Technology has truly taken over the world we live in. We can ask our phone a question, and it can answer back with a correct response. We can Google the answer to almost any question we have, regardless of where we are. Even five years ago this seemed impossible. It seemed crazy to even consider. Computers are a boatload of knowledge, and I’m not sure how our parents made it through school without them. However, sometimes it is scary to think about how much they know. I have a running joke with my boyfriend that Siri, the annoying little voice on the IPhone, is going to take over the world. It’s a joke obviously, but still… could it be possible that technology could surpass the human race?

            Brian Christian’s The Most Human Human features a test that determines whether or not computers can really think. I think the book provides a fantastic analysis of the differences between humankind and computers. After all, sometimes in today’s world it seems as if there is very little separating computers and humans. Computers have a database of information, can speak, and can even embody human characteristics if programmed that way. However, one specific point Christian makes in his book, which I think truly separates computers and humans, is that while computers may be able to handle many things, “mere mumbling destroys them.”

            It is natural for humans to mumble when caught off guard or when searching for answers. It just happens. Regardless of how many times we are told by teachers, parents, and bosses to reframe from using the word “um,” we still do so because of how natural it is. However, regardless of how frowned upon the dreaded word “um” is, it is something that technology cannot compute no matter how hard it tries. In his book, Christian cites examples of answering questions given by the chatbot, ELIZA, with words such as “er…” and “um…” ELIZA is automatically confused by these responses and cannot answer appropriately. The same thing, ironically, occurs when speaking to Siri. If you start mumbling nonsense, Siri gets “frustrated” and doesn’t understand how to respond at all.

            I think this simple fact proves superiority of humans over computers. Mumbling is a normal part of human makeup. We get confused, embarrassed, caught off guard, etc. and show it through mumbling. Mumbling is a natural human reaction, and ironically, this natural human reaction causes the downfall of computers. While computers can be programmed to have human knowledge and actions, they cannot “learn” natural human reactions. It’s impossible, and these natural reactions separate humans from computers and hinder their ability to think.

            The 2009 movie, Avatar, is interesting because it depicts a world in which creatures, equal to humans in every way, reside, live, and thrive. It’s interesting because when I first watched this movie, I automatically assumed the Na’vi would have some disadvantage to the humans, but they didn’t. Ironically, it wasn’t their insane intelligence that far surpassed the human race that made me think this way but was, instead, their reactions and emotions that mimic those of humans. The Na’vi feel love and betrayal, just as humans do. In the end, it is not their intelligence that saves them, but their wildlife friends they have nurtured and Eywa, the goddess they worship. These very human characteristics- religion and nurture- keep the Na’vi alive, just as very human reactions, such as mumbling, allow us to continue to confuse technology.  

4 comments:

  1. I definitely agree! Part of being human is how we utilize our language. It's the sole reason we're able to differentiate between "outsiders" and "in-towners." For example, you always know when someone is new to the town because they don't use the lingo correctly. Either that or they sound too formal when they speak. Like you, I watched Avatar, too. I thought that I would find a completely different set of species, but you were right, there wasn't a time when I thought "oh they def aren't human." I also didn't think about it, but thanks to your post, religion is also on my list of humanistic characteristics. How do you program faith into a computer? It seems to me that the computer would merely think of these as factual things rather than spiritual. They don't carry the soul that a human possesses.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is interesting that computers do not have a lapse in thought, or need a moment to collect their thoughts like humans do. Which goes to show that maybe the biggest difference between computers/A.Is is the imperfection that humans have. When A.Is communicate a thought it is a well thought out smooth sentence with no lapse. But when talking to another person, the word "like" is said 10x more than any other word.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One of the most human things to do is take a moment to ponder an answer. For us, there are so many options we can choose from. Depending on the question and the person we're talking to, our answers may not always be completely true either. One thing that is so human to do is to lie, especially when it benefits us most.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like how you mentioned that it wasn't the Avatar creatures insane intelligence that made them 'human', however it was their emotions. I'm like you in that perspective. When I watched Avatar, that is what made my sympathize most with them. Their very human emotions of anger, love, joy, hate, and betrayal caused me to relate with them. It seems me watching the Avatar creatures experience love and suffering attracts me to view them as more human.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.